HKB

← back

The Apologia and Florida of Apuleius of Madaura

Apuleius of Madaura · c. 158–161 CE (composed after the Oea trial; includes the Apologia and related Florida orations, with the Florida pieces composed across the 160s) primary

passage 76 of 141 · (76/111)

in brief
He replies to claims that he sought Pudentilla for greed or her dowry, asserting the marriage settlement shows the opposite, detailing a trust-like dowry and inheritance conditions for Pudentilla’s sons and any children of the marriage.

will go on with the argument on which I had entered and will show that I had no motive for seducing Pudentilla into marriage by the use of love philtres.

My accusers have gone out of their way to make disparaging remarks both about her age and her appearance; they have denounced me for desiring such a wife from motives of greed and robbing her of her vast and magnificent dowry at the very outset of our wedded life. I do not intend to weary you, Maximus, with a long reply on these points. There is no need for words from me, our deeds of settlement will speak more eloquently than I can do. From them you will see that both in my provision for the future and in my action at the time my conduct was precisely the opposite of that which they have attributed to me, inferring my rapacity from their own. You will see that Pudentilla's dowry was small, considering her wealth, and was made over to me as a trust not as a gift, and moreover that the marriage only took place on this condition that if my wife should die without leaving me any children, the dowry should go to her sons Pontianus and Pudens, while if at her death she should leave me one son or daughter, half of the dowry was to go to the offspring of the second marriage, the remainder to the sons of the first.

← previous passage read in the full work → next passage →

topics: contracts, oaths, and obligation · marriage and betrothal · property, inheritance, and title

The Apologia and Florida of Apuleius of Madaura · Apuleius of Madaura · 155–169