HKB

← back

The Comedies of Terence

Terence · c. 166 BCE

passage 2 of 180 · SCENE, ATHENS.

↪ you wandered here via “Menander vs Philemon rivalry” — the connecting lines are tinted below

in brief
The prologue explains that the playwright originally wrote only to please the public, but must now write prologues to refute slanders from an older rival, defending plot and style similarities with Menander.

PROLOGUE.

The Bard, when first he gave his mind to write, Thought it his only business, that his Plays Should please the people: but it now falls out, He finds, much otherwise, and wastes, perforce, His time in writing Prologues; not to tell The argument, but to refute the slanders Broach'd by the malice of an older Bard. And mark what vices he is charg'd withal! Menander wrote the Andrian and Perinthian: Know one, and you know both; in argument Less diff'rent than in sentiment and style. What suited with the Andrian he confesses From the Perinthian he transferr'd, and us'd For his: and this it is these sland'rers blame, Proving by deep and learned disputation, That Fables should not be contaminated. Troth! all the knowledge is they nothing know: Who, blaming; him, blame Naevius, Plautus, Ennius, Whose great example is his precedent; Whose negligence he'd wish to emulate Rather than their dark diligence. Henceforth, Let them, I give them warning, be at peace, And cease to rail, lest they be made to know Their own misdeeds. Be favorable! sit With equal mind, and hear our play; that hence Ye may conclude, what hope to entertain, The comedies he may hereafter write Shall merit approbation or contempt.

[Changes:

Harper That Fables should not be contaminated. Colman 1768 That Fables should not be confounded thus.]

← previous passage read in the full work → next passage →

topics: censorship and the press · history and the writing of history · poetry and the poets

The Comedies of Terence · Terence · 166 BCE