HKB

← back

An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision

George Berkeley · 1709 primary

passage 28 of 54 · (25/51)

↪ you wandered here via “visual attention to distant objects” — the connecting lines are tinted below

in brief
He critiques prior explanations of the horizontal moon, mentions the “Transactions” and Dr. Wallis, and gives the alternative approach that sight estimates size using both visual angle and perceived distance.

account for that phenomenon which, though it seems not to contain anything new or different from what had been said before by others, I shall nevertheless consider in this place.

  1. His opinion, in short, is this; we judge not of the magnitude of an object by the visual angle alone, but by the visual angle in conjunction with the distance. Hence, though the angle remain the same, or even become less, yet if withal the distance seem to have been increased, the object shall appear greater. Now, one way whereby we estimate the distance of anything is by the number and extent of the intermediate objects: when therefore the moon is seen in the horizon, the variety of fields, houses, etc., together with the large prospect of the wide extended land or sea that lies between the eye and the utmost limb of the horizon, suggest unto the mind the idea of greater distance, and consequently magnify the appearance. And this, according to Dr. Wallis, is the true account of the extraordinary largeness attributed by the mind to the horizontal moon at a time when the angle subtended by its diameter is not one jot greater than it used to be.
← previous passage read in the full work → next passage →

topics: history and the writing of history · perception and the senses

An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision · George Berkeley · 1709