Income and excess-profits taxes on income of "every corporation," as applied to income of an oil corporation from leases of land granted by the United States to a State, for the support of common schools, etc., held an interference with State governmental functions. (See Tenth Amendment.)
Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co., 285 U.S. 393 (April 11, 1932).
The tax "upon all tennis rackets, golf clubs, baseball bats * * * balls of all kinds, including baseballs * * * sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer * * *" as applied to articles sold by a manufacturer to a commission merchant for exportation, held a tax on exports within the prohibition of article I, section 9.
Spalding & Bros. v. Edwards, 262 U.S. 66 (April 23, 1923).
The amendment of sections 24 and 256 of the Judicial Code (which prescribe the jurisdiction of district courts) "saving * * * to claimants the rights and remedies under the workmen's compensation law of any State," held an attempt to transfer legislative power to the States--the Constitution, by article III, section 2, and article I, section 8, having adopted rules of general maritime law.
Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart, 253 U.S. 149 (May 17, 1920).
Specifically, that part of the Minimum Wage Law of the District of Columbia which authorized the Wage Board "to ascertain and declare * * * (a) Standards of minimum wages for women in any occupation within the District of Columbia, and what wages are inadequate to supply the necessary cost of living to any such women workers to maintain them in good health and to protect their morals * * *," held to interfere with freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
Adkins et al. v. Children's Hospital and Adkins et al. v. Lyons, 261 U.S. 525 (April 9, 1923)--overruled in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (March 29, 1937).
That part of section 213 of the Revenue Act of 1918 which provided that "* * * for the purposes of this title * * * the term 'gross income'
Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (June 1, 1920).
Miles v. Graham (268 U.S. 501, June 1, 1925), held it invalid as applied to a judge taking office subsequent to the date of the act.
That part of the estate tax providing that "gross estate" of a decedent should include value of all property "to the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time made a transfer or with respect to which he had at any time created a trust, in contemplation of or intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after his death (whether such transfer or trust is made or created before or after the passage of this act), except in case of a bona fide sale * * *" as applied to a transfer of property made prior to the act and intended to take effect "in possession or enjoyment" at death of grantor, but not in fact testamentary or designed to evade taxation, held confiscatory, contrary to Fifth Amendment.
Nichols, Collector v. Coolidge et al., Executors, 274 U.S. 531 (May 31, 1927).
The Child Labor Tax Act, providing that "every person * * * operating
Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. (Child Labor Tax Case), 259 U.S. 20 (May 15, 1922).